What are PVA Microfiber and PU Microfiber cloths?
Share
At a Glance:
At first glance, PU microfibre and PVA microfibre cloths may look similar, as they are both made from synthetic materials and are designed to offer high absorbency and cleaning capabilities. However, there are some key differences that can help you tell them apart:
1. Texture:
- PU Microfiber (Polyurethane): The texture of PU microfiber cloths is usually softer and more elastic. It may have a smoother and more flexible feel to the touch due to the nature of the polyurethane.
- PVA Microfiber (Polyvinyl Alcohol): PVA microfiber cloths have a firmer, rubbery texture when dry. When wet, they become softer, but still maintain a slightly different texture than PU cloths, feeling more like a sponge.
2. Appearance:
- PU Microfiber: These cloths may have a more matte and flexible appearance, with a less visible fiber structure. They tend to appear thinner and similar in appearance to standard microfiber.
- PVA Microfibre: PVA microfibre cloths often have a more rubbery or plastic-like appearance when dry. Some may even appear a little shinier due to their PVA coating.
3. Absorption:
- PU Microfiber: This material has a high absorption capacity, but not as much as PVA cloths. It dries relatively quickly after being wet.
- PVA Microfibre: PVA cloths are extremely absorbent and can hold a lot of water, giving them a heavier feel when wet. They also tend to take longer to dry compared to PU cloths.
4. Drying behavior:
- PU Microfiber: They tend to remain flexible after drying, making them easy to fold and store.
- PVA Microfiber: When dry, PVA microfiber cloths tend to become stiff, so it is advisable to moisten them before use to restore their softness.
These differences in texture, appearance and behavior can help you distinguish between the two types of cloths by sight and touch.
Technical differences:
The technical differences between PU microfibre and PVA microfibre cloths are deeper and have to do with the chemical composition, performance and absorption and durability characteristics of the materials. Here are the main technical differences:
1. Material Composition:
- PU Microfiber (Polyurethane): PU microfiber is composed of very fine synthetic fibers that may be mixed with polyurethane. Polyurethane is a polymer that provides flexibility and wear resistance.
- PVA Microfiber (Polyvinyl Alcohol): In PVA microfiber cloths, synthetic fibers are coated or impregnated with PVA, a highly absorbent polymer, giving them superior water retention capacity.
2. Absorption Capacity:
- PU Microfibre: PU cloths have good absorption capacity, but their design is more focused on the ability to drag and retain dirt due to the fine synthetic fibres. In terms of water absorption, they are surpassed by PVA cloths.
- PVA Microfibre: PVA cloths are known for their high absorption capacity, which can retain several times their weight in water. This is due to the porous structure of PVA, which allows for rapid absorption and retention of liquids.
3. Strength and Durability:
- PU Microfiber: Polyurethane gives the cloth greater resistance to wear and tear, and it performs well in terms of durability. It is resistant to chemicals and can withstand multiple wash cycles without losing effectiveness.
- PVA Microfibre: Although PVA cloths are highly absorbent, they tend to be less resistant to physical wear and tear than PU cloths. They can deteriorate more quickly if used with harsh chemicals or if subjected to intensive use without proper care.
4. Drying Speed:
- PU Microfiber: PU microfiber cloths dry relatively quickly after absorbing liquids, which helps prevent the proliferation of bacteria and bad odors. This makes them ideal for environments where fast drying is required.
- PVA Microfiber: Due to their high absorbency, PVA cloths take longer to dry completely. By absorbing so much water, they stay wet for longer, which can be a disadvantage in environments where the material needs to dry quickly.
5. Cleaning Capacity:
- PU Microfiber: PU microfiber is specifically designed to trap and hold dust, dirt, and oils without the need for additional cleaning products. The fine fibers can penetrate microscopic surfaces, making them highly effective for mechanical cleaning.
- PVA Microfiber: Although also good for cleaning, PVA microfiber cloths are more effective when it comes to absorbing large amounts of liquid, but are not as effective at capturing dust and dry dirt as PU cloths.
6. Elasticity and Flexibility:
- PU Microfiber: PU gives the cloths greater elasticity and flexibility, making them easier to handle on uneven or complex shaped surfaces. They maintain their flexibility even after multiple uses and wash cycles.
- PVA Microfibre: PVA microfibre cloths tend to be less flexible, especially when dry, becoming stiff. When wet, they regain some flexibility, but are still less malleable than PU cloths.
7. Chemical Resistance:
- PU Microfiber: It has good resistance to chemicals including mild acids and alkalis, making it suitable for various industrial and professional cleaning applications.
- PVA Microfiber: Although resistant to some chemicals, PVA cloths can be affected by organic solvents and harsh chemicals, which could reduce their lifespan in certain industrial environments.
8. Shelf life:
- PU Microfiber: Generally, PU microfiber cloths have a longer lifespan due to their resistance to wear, multiple washes and exposure to chemicals.
- PVA Microfiber: PVA microfiber cloths have a shorter lifespan in comparison, as they can wear out faster when exposed to heavy use conditions or harsh chemicals.
9. Applications:
- PU Microfiber: Ideal for applications requiring detailed cleaning, dust and dirt removal, as well as for delicate surfaces that require careful treatment.
- PVA Microfiber: Primarily used in environments where liquid absorption is paramount, such as window cleaning, car cleaning, or situations where large amounts of water or spills need to be picked up.
In summary, while PU microfibre cloths offer a combination of effective cleaning and durability, PVA microfibre cloths are superior in terms of absorbency, but with lower long-term strength and slower drying. The choice between the two types depends on the specific use you want to give them, prioritising either absorbency or cleaning capacity and durability.